Hi all
I tend agree with Pat that we need a specific direction for our content, there’s some great stuff here but the scope perhaps needs reduction, which is kind of why I thought our idea in class of looking at 3D could be the overall conceptual content, but give individuals plenty of room for expression such as Ice type, sculptures, graphics etc depending on peoples desired exploration and interests...
Hi Carli.. I don’t think ppl are thinking necessarily of producing or constructing a 3D object as such (its just one way of looking at 3D as typographic image) it can still be produced via 2D means, such as Illustrator, Photoshop, web, and photography.. I think?
However, If some ppl don’t want to work with 3D (i don’t really mind) then we perhaps need to start to look at our angle that ties our pub together..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Great work Chris!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you in regarding the actually production of the typographic imagery... it does not need to be 3D. can be drawn, cut, whatever'ed...
cool!
Yes, I think so too... the work can definitely be 2D, just..... a 2D illustration/image of something 3D. I guess its more the concept of 3-D that we want.
ReplyDelete